If nothing truly is going to get passed until after November then why oh why are we paying them then? Some say it's strategy, some say it's cowardice, some say it's just politics at it's worst. But seriously, if they aren't going to work couldn't we save some money if we put the House and the Senate along with all their staff and toadies on furlough? That's been the solution for the smaller government groups like the States and Cities, isn't it? I know there will still be a need to have some people there, the paper doesn't push itself. However the rest of them that are just waiting for the Elephant or the Ass to take up residence before they do anything. The concept is equally repugnant and mind-numbingly inane that we shouldn't have to pay for it. Both sides are screaming for reduction in spending, here's one way they can cut the fat, trim the gristle and maybe show the voters they are willing to go from a fillet mignon diet to chicken for a few months."Nothing will get passed until after the election."
This would actually be a good time to put in a reliable, secure BYOD (as in they bring their own device they've paid for instead up upgrading on the tax-payers dime) so they can be just as mobile and responsive to their constituents as we have to be to our subordinates, peers and management. (I'm not saying we need to run the country like a business, because seriously, you can't lay off the voters).
What are my political views, you might wonder: I'm undecided. I call myself a free-thinker because I look at both sides, see which one can do the most good, get the most done and then I vote for the lesser of the two evils.